Interference No. 105,284
Cooper v. McPherson
not file a motion to designate Cooper’s claims 2-9 as corresponding to the count. Cooper states
that it abandons the contest, which is construed as a request for entry of adverse judgment.
The joint motion incorporating Cooper’s request for entry of adverse judgment is
granted. It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein entered against
junior party GARY L. COOPER;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party GARY L. COOPER is not entitled to its
application claims 1 and 10 which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
involved application or patent of the parties.
/ss/ Jameson Lee
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
/ss/ Carol A. Spiegel ) BOARD OF PATENT
CAROL A. SPIEGEL ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
/ss/ James T. Moore )
JAMES T. MOORE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007