Interference No. 105,287
Mori v. Freund
All of Mori's claims corresponding to the count have been held unpatentable under
35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for lack of written description in the specification. See
Decision on Freund's Motion I (Paper No. 38). Entry of judgment is now appropriate. It is
ORDERED that judgment is herein entered against junior party KENTARO
MORI, TAKAHIDE TANAKA, AKIRA NAKAGAWA and IWAO KOJIMA;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party KENTARO MORI, TAKARIDE
TANAKA, AKIRA NAKAGAWA and IWAO KOJHVIA is not entitled to its patent claims 4, 5
and 6;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should
note the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
involved application or patent of the parties.
/ss/ Jameson Lee
JAMESON LEE
Administrative Patent Judge
/ss/ James T. Moore BOARD OF PATENT
JAMES T. MOORE APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge AND
INTERFERENCES
/ss/ Linda Poteate
LINDA POTEATE
Administrative Patent Judge
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007