Interference No. 105,353 Pace v. Hilscher Junior party Pace has requested entry of adverse judgment and expressly abandoned its involved application. (Paper No. 21). The request is herein granted. It is ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein entered against junior party JOHN PACE; FURTHER ORDERED that junior party JOHN PACE is not entitled to its application claims 1-16 and 18-24; FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective involved application or patent of the parties. /ss/ Jameson Lee JAMESON LEE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) /ss/ James T. Moore ) BOARD OF PATENT JAMES T. MOORE ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) /ss/ Linda Poteate ) LINDA POTEATE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -2-Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007