Interference No. 105,385
Bullard v. Schweitzer
Junior party has filed a paper conceding priority as to the subject matter of the count in
this interference. (Paper No. 23). The concession of priority is treated as a request for entry of
adverse judgment. 37 CFR § 41.127(b). The request is granted. It is
ORDERED thatjudgment as to the subject matter of Count I is herein entered against
the junior party WILLIAM C.C. BULLARD, KEVIN FARRELL, STEVEN BALL, and DANIEL
0. MAHONEY, 11;
FURTHER ORDERED that the junior party WILLIAM C.C. BULLARD, KEVIN
FARRELL, STEVEN BALL, and DANIEL 0. MAHONEY, LI is not entitled to a patent
containing its patent claims 1-22 which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
involved application or patent of the parties.
_2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007