Westbrook claims that remain designated as corresponding to the count. (Paper 50 at 2).
Upon consideration of the record and for reasons given, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority is entered against junior party CAROL A.
WESTBROOK;
FURTHER ORDERED that CAROL A. WESTBROOK is not entitled to a patent
containing claims 1 through 25 of US patent 6,025,126, which claims correspond to count 1, the
sole count in the interference; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment shall be entered into the
administrative records of Westbrook's 6,025,126 patent and Gray's 09/765,207 application.
_________________________________
RICHARD E. SCHAFER )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
_________________________________ ) BOARD OF PATENT
SALLY GARDNER LANE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
_________________________________ )
SALLY C. MEDLEY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007