Interference No. 105,224
Cording v. Richardson
junior party Cording, whose involved case in this interference is an application, is left with no
patentable claim that corresponds to the count, a priority determination is no longer necessary.
Judgment will now be entered. It is
ORDERED that judgment is herein entered against claims 124-138 of junior party
CHRISTOPHER R. CORDING’s involved application 10/400,067, and that junior party
CHRISTOPHER R. CORDING is not entitled to claims 124-138 of its involved application
10/400,067;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is herein entered against claims 8-10 and 27 of
senior party RICHARD J. RICHARDSON and BENNIE REED DOWNING’s involved Patent
No. 6,606,832, and that senior party RICHARD J. RICHARDSON and BENNIE REED
DOWNING is not entitled to claims 8-10 and 27 of its involved Patent No. 6,606,832;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved
application or patent of the parties.
April 7, 2005
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007