Mail Stop INTERFERENCES Not binding precedent P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 Tel: 571-272-9797 Fax: 571-273-0042 Paper 33 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Patent Interference No. 105,297 SHIN-ETSU CHEMICAL CO. LTD. (6,280,898 B1), Junior Party, v. NEC CORPORATION (09/750,116), Senior Party. Entered: 15 July 2005 Judgment - Bd. R. 127(b) - Requested Before SCHAFER, TORCZON, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge. Shin-Etsu has filed notice (Paper 32) of its abandonment of the contest with respect to count 2, the sole count. Abandonment of the contest is treated as a request for adverse judgment. Bd.R. 127(b)(4). Shin-Etsu further expresses an intent to file a reissue application seeking claims directed to "subject matter removed from original Count 1", which Shin-Etsu states will not be subject to estoppel under Bd.R. 127(a)(1). We note that whether an estoppel exists depends on what precisely Shin-Etsu claims and that estoppel can arise both under the rule and also from the lost count itself. See In re Deckler, 977 F.2d 1449, 1452, 24 USPQ2d 1448, 1449 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (claims to patentably indistinct variant of lost count not patentable). We offer this caveat, not because we doubt Shin-Etsu'sPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007