Interference No. 105,313
Tomita v. Godil
For reasons discussed above, the second declaration of James Hunter (Exhibit 2002) is
not entitled to consideration. Since party Tomita’s argument on why judgment should not be
entered against Tomita is based on acceptance and consideration of James Hunter’s second
declaration, good cause has not been shown on why judgment should not be entered against
junior party Tomita. And even if the second declaration of James Hunter is accepted for
consideration and actually considered, for reasons discussed above party Tomita still has not
shown good cause why judgment should not be entered against it.
Judgment will be entered against junior party Tomita in a separate paper.
/ss/ Jameson Lee
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
/ss/ James T. Moore ) BOARD OF PATENT
JAMES T. MOORE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
/ss/ Linda Poteate )
LINDA POTEATE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007