Accordingly, it is:
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1
is herein entered against junior party WALTER NAVARRINI;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party WALTER NAVARRINI is not
entitled to its application claims 52-57 which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein
entered against senior party ALLAN T. WORM, GEORGE G.I. MOORE, MIGUEL A.
GUERRA, WERNER SCHWERTFEGER, KLAUS HINTZER, ZAI-MING QIU and ERIK D.
HARE;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party ALLAN T. WORM, GEORGE G.I. MOORE,
MIGUEL A. GUERRA, WERNER SCHWERTFEGER, KLAUS HINTZER, ZAI-MING QIU
and ERIK D. HARE is not entitled to its patent claims 7-9 which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision shall be placed and given a paper
number in the files of U.S. Patent 6,255,536 and U.S. Application 09/840,582.
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to
35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 41.205.
/Sally C. Medley/ )
ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE )
)
/Linda M. Gaudette/ ) BOARD OF PATENT
ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
/Mark Nagumo/ )
ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007