1 Upon consideration of the record and for reasons given, it is 2 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 3, the sole count of the 3 interference, is awarded against junior party RANDY M. BERKA, DANIEL CULLEN, 4 GREGORY L. GRAY, KIRK J. HAYENGA, and VIRGIL B. LAWLIS; 5 FURTHER ORDERED that junior party RANDY M. BERKA, DANIEL 6 CULLEN, GREGORY L. GRAY, KIRK J. HAYENGA, and VIRGIL B. LAWLIS is not 7 entitled to a patent containing claims 34 and 53 of patent 5,364,770, which claims 8 correspond to Count 3; 9 FURTHER ORDRED that junior party RANDY M. BERKA, DANIEL 10 CULLEN, GREGORY L. GRAY, KIRK J. HAYENGA, and VIRGIL B. LAWLIS is not 11 entitled to a patent containing claims 37, 65, and 81 of patent 5,578,463, which claims 12 correspond to Count 3; 13 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment shall be entered into 14 the administrative records of Berka patents 5,364,770 and 5,578,463 and Boel 15 application 08/435,557. 16 ) 17 /Sally Gardner Lane/ ) 18 SALLY GARDNER LANE ) 19 Administrative Patent Judge ) 20 ) 21 ) 22 /Michael P. Tierney/ ) 23 MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) BOARD OF PATENT 24 Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND 25 ) INTERFERENCES 26 ) 27 /James T. Moore/ ) 28 JAMES T. MOORE ) 28 Administrative Patent Judge 29 ) 30 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007