The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 120
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Filed: April 20, 2006
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
Tel: 571-272-9797
Fax: 571-273-0042
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
______________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
(Administrative Patent Judge Richard E. Schafer)
______________________
Bayer CropScience S.A.,
Junior Party
(Patent 6,069,115 - Ken Pallet et al. inventors),
v.
Syngenta Limited,
Senior Party
(Application 09/791,489 - Ian Jepson et al. inventors).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 105,255 (RES)
_______________
1 Before: SCHAFER, HANLON and GARDNER LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
2 SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
3 Judgment - Request for Adverse - Bd.R. 127(b)
4 Syngenta has requested and agreed to entry of adverse judgment with respect to the subject
5 matter of the Count. Paper 119.
6 Accordingly , it is
7 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 1 (Paper 22,
8 p. 1), is awarded against the senior party, SYNGENTA LIMITED (Application 09/791,489 - Ian
9 Jepson et al. inventors);
Page: 1 2 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007