Schwartz et al. V. Sawhney et al. - Page 1



      1                        The opinion in support of the decision being                                
      2                    entered today is not binding precedent of the board.                            
      34    Paper 53                                                                                       
      5     Filed by:                                                                                      
      67    Trial Division Merits Panel                                                                    
      8     Mail Stop Interference                                                                         
      9     P.O. Box 1450                                              Filed 27 April 2006                 
     10     Alexandria Va 22313-1450                                                                       
     11     Tel: 571-272-9797                                                                              
     12     Fax: 571-273-0042                                                                              
     13                                                                                                    
     14                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
     15 _______________                                                                                    
     16                                                                                                    
     17                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
     18                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                
     19 _______________                                                                                    
     20                                                                                                    
     21                      DANIEL M. SCHWARTZ, JEFFREY A. HUBBELL                                        
     22                               and ALEXANDER R. IRVINE,                                             
     23                                                                                                    
     24                                      Junior Party                                                  
     25                                (Patent 6,475,508 B1),                                              
     26                                                                                                    
     27                                             v.                                                     
     28                                                                                                    
     29                     AMARPREET S. SAWHNEY, MICHELLE D. LYMAN,                                       
     30                     PETER K. JARRETT and RONALD S. RUDOWSKY,                                       
     31                                                                                                    
     32                                      Senior Party                                                  
     33                              (Application 10/338,933).                                             
     34 _______________                                                                                    
     35                                                                                                    
     36                        Patent Interference No. 105,317 McK                                         
     37                               (Technology Center 1700)                                             
     38 _______________                                                                                    
     39                                                                                                    
     40     Before:  McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and                                     
     41     SCHAFER and LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
     42                                                                                                    
     43     McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge                                                   
     44                                                                                                    
     45                                    AMENDED JUDGMENT                                                
     46           For the reasons given in our MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER                                
     47     DENYING REHEARING (Paper 52) and solely to correct a clerical                                  
     48     mistake in our MEMORANDUM OPINION and JUDGMENT entered 3 November                              
     49     2005 (Paper 12), it is                                                                         






Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007