ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Counts 1 and 2 (Paper 1
pp. 3-4), is awarded against the junior party, Olympus Optical Co., LTD. (Patent 5,701,202);
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party, Olympus Optical Co., LTD., is not entitled to a
patent containing claims 4-20 and 28-33 (corresponding to Count 1) and claims 1-3 and 21-27
(corresponding to Count 2) of Patent 5,701,202;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made of record in the files of
U.S. Patent 5,701,202 and Application 08/959,285;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is any settlement agreement which has not been
filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 41.205.
/Richard E. Schafer/ )
RICHARD E. SCHAFER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
/James T. Moore/ ) BOARD OF PATENT
JAMES T. MOORE ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
/Mark Nagumo/ )
MARK NAGUMO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
cc (e-mail):
Counsel for Canon Kabushiki Kaisha: Counsel for Olympus Corporation:
Anthony M. Zupcic, Esq. Jeffrey D. Karceski, Esq.
FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
SCINTO PITTMAN LLP
30 Rockefeller Plaza 1650 Tysons Boulevard
New York, New York 10112-3800 McLean, Virginia 22102
Tel: 212-218-2100 Tel: 703-770-7900
Fax: 212-218-2200 Fax: 703-770-7901
E-mail: azupcic@fchs.com E-mail:
jeffrey.karceski@pillsburylaw.com
2
Page: Previous 1 2
Last modified: November 3, 2007