Ex Parte TAKAHASHI - Page 1




                                          The opinion in support of the decision being                                            
                                      entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                                                                         Paper 27                 
               Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences                                  Filed: June 21, 2006                   
               U.S. Patent and Trademark Office                                                                                   
               P.O. Box 1450                                                                                                      
               Alexandria, VA 22313-1450                                                                                          
                     Tel:   571-272-9797                                                                                         
               Fax:   571-273-0042                                                                                                
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                   ______________________                                                         
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                       (Administrative Patent Judge Richard E. Schafer)                                           
                                                   ______________________                                                         
                                                  Olympus Optical Co., LTD.,                                                      
                                                          Junior Party                                                            
                                                       (Patent 5,768,024;                                                         
                                              Named Inventor: Koichi Takahashi)                                                   
                                                                v.                                                                
                                                   Canon Kabushiki Kaisha,                                                        
                                                          Senior Party                                                            
                                                    (Application 09/333,998                                                       
                                  Named Inventors: Shoici Yamazki and Takeshi Nishimura).                                         

                                             Patent Interference No. 105,342 (RES)                                                
                                                   (Technology Center 2800)                                                       

               Before: SCHAFER, NAGUMO and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
               SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                              
                                       Judgment - Request for Adverse - Bd.R. 127(b)                                              
                      Olympus has requested entry of adverse judgment with respect to the subject matter of                       
               the Count.  Paper 26.                                                                                              
                      Accordingly , it is                                                                                         







Page:  1  2  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007