Interference No. 105,355
Hiroya v. Rosen
1 FURTHER ORDERED that junior party MASAAKI HIROYA and HIROSHI ASAO is
2 not entitled to its patent claims 1-4 and 12-18 which correspond to Count 1;
3 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
4 the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and
5 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
6 involved application or patent of the parties.
7 /Jameson Lee/
8 JAMESON LEE )
9 Administrative Patent Judge )
10 )
11 )
12 )
13 /Adriene Lepiane Hanlon/ ) BOARD OF PATENT
14 ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON ) APPEALS
15 Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
16 ) INTERFERENCES
17 )
18 )
19 /James T. Moore/ )
20 JAMES T. MOORE )
21 Administrative Patent Judge )
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007