1 FURTHER ORDERED that KENNETH NASH is not entitled to a patent
2 containing claims 1-4, 7-13, 17 and 18 (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S. patent
3 6,449,645.
4 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the
5 files of application 09/859,915 and U.S. Patent 6,449,645.
6 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is
7 directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd.R. 205.
8
9 /Lee E. Barrett/ )
10 LEE E. BARRETT )
11 Administrative Patent Judge )
12 )
13 )
14 /Jameson Lee/ ) BOARD OF PATENT
15 JAMESON LEE ) APPEALS AND
16 Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
17 )
18 )
19 /Sally C. Medley/ )
20 SALLY C. MEDLEY )
21 Administrative Patent Judge )
22
23
24 cc (via e-mail):
25
26 david@andersonlawfirm.com
27 knash@houston.rr.com
28 danny.huntington@bingham.com
29 bill.hughet@bingham.com
2
Page: Previous 1 2
Last modified: November 3, 2007