Gomes et al. V. Luo et al. - Page 2




                       entered against it. (Paper No. 42). Gomes has filed a paper stating that it will not show cause.                                                                 
                       (Paper No. 43).                                                                                                                                                  
                                 It is:                                                                                                                                                 
                                 ORDERED that Juruor Party Gomes has failed to provide a showing that it is entitled to                                                                 
                       priority of invention as against Senior Party Luo for the subject matter of Count 1, the sole count                                                              
                       in interference.                                                                                                                                                 
                                 FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority is entered against Junior Party Gomes                                                                        
                       on Count 1.                                                                                                                                                      
                                 FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Gomes is not entitled to a patent containing                                                                         
                       claims 1-5, all of which correspond to Count 1, of its involved U.S. Patent No. 6,267,956.                                                                       
                                 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the files of                                                                      
                       U.S. Application No. 09/762,491 and U.S. Patent No. 6,267,956.                                                                                                   
                                 FURTHER ORDERED that the parties attention is directed to the settlement agreement                                                                     
                       provisions in 35 U.S.C. §135(c) and 37 C.F.R. §41.205.                                                                                                           


                                                                 /ss/ Michael P. Tierney BOARD OF PATENT                                                                                
                                                                 MICHAEL P. TIERNEY APPEALS AND                                                                                         
                                                                 Administrative Patent Judge INTERFERENCES                                                                              











                                                                                          2                                                                                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007