Interference 105,364 and 105,365 Paper 74 Grubbs v. Herrmann In view of the DECISION — Interlocutory Motions Bd.R. 125(b) (Paper 72) and the REDECLARATION — Bd.R. 203 (Paper 73), it is: ORDERED that adverse judgment as to priority is 5 entered against Grubbs. FURTHER ORDERED that Robert H. Grubbs and Tina M. Trnka are not entitled to a patent containing claims 1—35 of U.S. Patent 6,426,419. FURTHER ORDERED that Robert H. Grubbs and Tina M. 10 Trnka are not entitled to a patent containing claims 1—20 of U.S. Patent 6,624,265. FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Decision shall be placed in the files of U.S. Patent 6,426,419 B1, U.S. Patent 6,624,265 B1, U.S. Application 15 10/630,552, and U.S. Application 11/021,967. -2-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007