Interference No. 105,371 Page 2 1 JUDGMENT 2 ORDERED that judgment be entered against junior party Yu for the subject matter of 3 count 1, the sole count; 4 FURTHER ORDERED that Yu claims 2, 5, 13, and 16 be cancelled; and 5 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be entered in the administrative 6 records of the involved patent and application. cc: For Yu and Van Scott: Robert M. Schulman, HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP, of Washington, D.C., with Patrick A. Doody, HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP, of McLean, Virginia, and Eugene Rzucidlo, HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP, of New York City, New York. For Neose Technologies, Inc.: Todd Esker and Jeffry Mann, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUSLLP, San Francisco, California. Notice: Agreements and understandings regarding the termination of an interference are subject to filing requirements under 35 U.S.C. 135(c). Notice: In the event of judicial review, note the requirements of Bd. R. 8(b).Page: Previous 1 2Last modified: November 3, 2007