1 It is: 2 ORDERED that judgment on priority of invention as to Counts 1 and 2, the only counts 3 in the interference, is awarded against Junior Party Wei. 4 FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Wei is not entitled to a patent containing 5 claims 1-64 of U.S. Patent No. 6,514,594, all of which correspond to Count 1. 6 FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Wei is not entitled to a patent containing 7 claims 61-64 of U.S. Patent No. 6,514,594, each of which corresponds to Count 2. 8 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the files of 9 U.S. Application No. 10/409,067 and U.S. Patent No. 6,514,594. 10 FURTHER ORDERED that the party’s attention is directed to the settlement agreement 11 12 provisions in 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 C.F.R. § 41.205. 13 14 15 16 /Richard Torczon/ ) 17 RICHARD TORCZON ) 18 ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE ) 19 ) 20 ) 21 /Sally C. Medley/ ) BOARD OF PATENT 22 SALLY C. MEDLEY ) APPEALS AND 23 ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE ) INTERFERENCES 24 ) 25 ) 26 /Michael P. Tierney/ ) 27 MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) 28 ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE ) 29 30 31 32 33 34 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007