1 Judgment). 2 It is: 3 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the sole count in interference, is 4 awarded against Junior Party Dumoutier. 5 FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Dumoutier is not entitled to a patent 6 containing claims 1, 3-8, 16, 18, and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 6,331,613, all of which correspond to 7 Count 1. 8 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the files of 9 U.S. Application No. 09/561,811 and U.S. Patent No. 6,331,613. 10 FURTHER ORDERED that should there be a settlement agreement, the parties 11 attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. §135(c) and 37 Bd. R. 205. 12 13 /s/ Richard Torczon ) 14 RICHARD TORCZON ) 15 Administrative Patent Judge ) 16 ) 17 ) 18 ) 19 /s/ Michael P. Tierney ) BOARD OF PATENT 20 MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) APPEALS 21 Administrative Patent Judge ) AND 22 ) INTERFERENCES 23 ) 24 ) 25 /s/ James T. Moore ) 26 JAMES T. MOORE ) 27 Administrative Patent Judge ) 28 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007