1 of this interference.
2 Upon consideration of the Request for Adverse Judgment, it is hereby:
3 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 2 (Paper 30, page 2) is awarded
4 against senior party TIMOTHY JOSEPH DALTON, STEPHEN EDWARD GRECO, JEFFREY
5 CURTIS HEDRICK, SATYANARAYANA V. NITTA, SAMPATH PURUSHOTHAMAN,
6 KENNETH PARKER RODBELL, and ROBERT ROSENBERG,
7 FURTHER ORDERED that senior party TIMOTHY JOSEPH DALTON, STEPHEN
8 EDWARD GRECO, JEFFREY CURTIS HEDRICK, SATYANARAYANA V. NITTA,
9 SAMPATH PURUSHOTHAMAN, KENNETH PARKER RODBELL, and ROBERT
10 ROSENBERG, is not entitled to a patent containing claims 26-32 and 34 (corresponding to
11 Count 2) of patent 6,451,712 B2.
12 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files of
13 application 10/394,342 and patent 6,451,712 B2.
14 FURTHER ORDERED that, if there is a settlement agreement, the parties shall direct
15 attention to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 41.205(a).
16 /Richard E. Schafer/ )
17 Administrative Patent Judge )
18 )
18
19 )
20 /Michael P. Tierney/ ) BOARD OF PATENT
21 Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
22 ) INTERFERENCES
23 )
24 /James T. Moore/ )
25 Administrative Patent Judge )
26
27
28 cc (via electronic mail):
29
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007