1 The opinion in support of the decision being 2 entered today is not binding precedent of the board. 34 Paper 19 5 Filed by: 67 Trial Division Merits Panel 8 Mail Stop Interference 9 P.O. Box 1450 Entered 14 March 2006 10 Alexandria Va 22313-1450 11 Tel: 571-272-9797 12 Fax: 571-273-0042 13 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 15 _______________ 16 17 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 18 AND INTERFERENCES 19 (Senior Administrative Patent Judge McKelvey) 20 _______________ 21 22 CHRISTOPHER L. BASZCZYNSKI, BENJAMIN A. BOWEN, 23 JOHN H. DUESING, LAURA A. TAGLIANI, 24 DAVID J. PETERSON and TONG ZHU, 25 26 Junior Party 27 (Patent 6,528,700 B1), 28 29 v. 30 31 CHARLES J. ARNTZEN, PETER B. KIPP 32 RAMESH KUMAR and GREGORY D. MAY, 33 34 Senior Party 35 (Application 09/129,298). 36 _______________ 37 38 Patent Interference 105,416 (McK) 39 Technology Center 1600 40 _______________ 41 42 McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and TIERNEY and 43 MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. 44 45 McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. 46 47 48 JUDGMENT 49 50 The board has received from Baszczynski a paper styled 51 BASZCZYNSKI CONCESSION OF PRIORITY (Paper 18). The paper states 52 that "BASZCZYNSKI herewith concedes priority of the count."Page: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007