Upon consideration of the record, including the fact that the now 1 junior party Luzio has abandoned the contest, it is 2 3 ORDERED that Luzio's abandonment of the contest is treated a 4 request for entry of an adverse judgment. Cf. Guinn v. Kopf, 96 F.3d 1419, 5 40 USPQ2d 1157 (Fed. Cir. 1996). 6 ORDERDED that judgment on priority as to Count 2 (the sole 7 count in the interference; Paper 21, page 3) is awarded against junior party 8 GARY LUZIO, SUSAN C. FORMAN and TIMOTHY C. GERRISH, 9 FURTHER ORDERED that junior party GARY LUZIO, 10 SUSAN C. FORMAN and TIMOTHY C. GERRISH is not entitled to a 11 patent containing claim 100 (corresponding to Count 2) of: 12 U.S. Patent 6,428,837 B1 13 issued 6 August 2002 14 based on application 09/589,887 15 filed 9 June 2000 16 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, 17 attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c). 18 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this JUDGMENT 19 shall be placed in the files of (1) U.S. Patent 6,428,837 B1 and 20 (2) application 10/376,512. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007