Upon expiration of the due date for a response to the OC, counsel for Snider informed board personnel that Snider would not respond to the OC. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1 at 4) in the interference is awarded against junior party HUBERTUS V. THOMEER and SARMAD ADNAN. FURTHER ORDERED that junior party HUBERTUS V. THOMEER and SARMAD ADNAN is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-14 (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S. patent 6,333,700. FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the files of application 09/586,648 and U.S. Patent 6,333,700. FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd.R. 205. /Jameson Lee/ ) JAMESON LEE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) /Sally G. Lane/ ___ )BOARD OF PATENT SALLY G. LANE ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) /Sally C. Medley/ ) SALLY C. MEDLEY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) −2−Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007