1 its involved claims 1-24, all of which are designated as corresponding to Count 1. Accordingly,
2 it is:
3 ORDERED that judgment on priority of invention as to Count 1, the sole count in
4 interference, is awarded against Junior Party Hung.
5 FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Hung is not entitled to a patent containing
6 claims 1-24 of Hung, U.S. Patent. No. 6,172,459, all of which correspond to Count 1.
7 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the files of
8 U.S. Application No. 10/648,297 and U.S. Patent No. 6,172,459.
9 . FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ attention is directed to the settlement agreement
10 provisions in 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 C.F.R. § 41.205.
11
12
13 /Richard E. Schafer/ )
14 RICHARD E. SCHAFER )
15 ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE )
16 )
17 )
18 /Michael P. Tierney/ ) BOARD OF PATENT
19 MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) APPEALS AND
20 ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE ) INTERFERENCES
21 )
22 )
23 /James T. Moore/ )
24 JAMES T. MOORE )
25 ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE )
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007