Yachareni et al. V. Guterman et al. - Page 2




                  Interference No.  105,475                                                                                                                    
                  Yachareni v. Guterman                                                                                                                        
                            The parties have filed a joint request for entry of adverse judgment (Paper 18).  The                                              
                  request is granted.                                                                                                                          
                           It is                                                                                                                              
                                     ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein entered                                               
                  against both junior party SANTOSH K. YACHARENI, KAZUHIRO KURIHARA, BING Q.                                                                   
                  LE, and MICHAEL S.C. CHUNG, and senior party DANIEL C. GUTERMAN and YUPIN                                                                    
                  KAWING FONG;                                                                                                                                 
                                     FURTHER ORDERED  that junior party SANTOSH K. YACHARENI,                                                                  
                  KAZUHIRO KURIHARA, BING Q. LE, and MICHAEL S.C. CHUNG is not entitled to its                                                                 
                  patent claims 1-3 which correspond to Count 1, and that senior party DANIEL C. GUTERMAN                                                      
                  and YUPIN KAWING FONG is not entitled to its application claims 42-44 and 51-53 which                                                        
                  correspond to Count 1;                                                                                                                       
                                     FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should                                               
                  note the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and                                                                            














                                                                              2                                                                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007