LEID et al. V. MANGELSDORF et al. - Page 2




          1            Maria Vignone, a Trial Division paralegal, has spoken with a Judith Kim of Sterne                           
          2    Kessler Goldstein Fox, who represented that she is counsel for Junior Party Leid.  Ms. Kim                          
          3    informed Ms. Vignone that Junior Party Leid would not be filing papers in this interference.                        
          4    Failure to file requisite papers is construed as an abandonment of the contest, which is an action                  
          5    that is considered a request for adverse judgment.  Bd. R. 127(b)(4).                                               
          6            It is:                                                                                                      
          7            ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the sole count in interference, is                         
          8    awarded against Junior Party Leid.                                                                                  
          9            FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Leid is not entitled to a patent containing                               
        10     claims 10-13, 16, and 19 of Leid, U.S. Patent No. 6,635,429, all of which correspond to Count 1.                    
        11             FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the files of                           
        12     U.S. Application No. 08/467,543 and U.S. Patent No. 6,635,429.                                                      



















                                                               -2-                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007