Appeal No. 2005-0642 Application No. 09/568,278 Although the language reciting a catch beam has been removed from the claims in the reissue application, new language has been added which recites a hook element. Each of the independent claims 26, 37, 45, and 46, recites in part: “a hook . . . to prevent said latch from moving out of the latched position.” As is evident from the previous quotations, the broadening and narrowing of the claims of the present reissue application relate to the same subject matter. The claim element “catch beam” in the parent application relates to a portion of the latch which secures the latch in a latched position. The claim element “hook” in the reissue application similarly relates to a portion of the latch which prevents the latch from moving out of the latched position, i.e., securing the latch in the latched position. Thus, unlike the broadening and narrowing of the claims in the Pannu reissue application, the claims in the present reissue are narrowed in the same subject matter as their broadening. Moreover, the claims in the reissue application are clearly not as broad as the claims of the parent without the language reciting the catch beams. Thus, in accordance with the holding in Pannu, the Appellants have avoided the rule against recapture, and so claims 26-46 of the reissue application were improperly rejected. We disagree. As the Examiner accurately points out in the Supplemental Examiner’s Answer at pages 9-10: While it is true that the catch beam elements (94) and the hook element (106) are both located on different portions of the latch means (80) and both perform a securing function, the specification clearly teaches that the two securing means operate independently of each other. This is shown to be true by the fact that neither securing means needs the presence of the other to perform its securing function. Note, that the specification on lines 18-20 of column 6 states that “hook 106 - 47 -Page: Previous 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007