Ex Parte Apps et al - Page 11



         Appeal 2005-0801                                                                                       
         Application 09/848,628                                                                                 

                                    (1) Gebr Otto (Gebr), German Patent DE 4002174 C1                           
                in view of                                                                                      
                                    (2) Kuelmichel (Kuel), German Patent DE 3936099                             
                A1.                                                                                             
                             33. Gebr and Kuel are prior art vis-à-vis applicant under                          
                35 U.S.C. § 102(b).                                                                             

                             34. The Examiner found that Gebr describes “in Figure 1 a                          
                compost waste trolley with vent hole (23) in its lower portion and lid (4).”                    

                             35. However, the Examiner found that Gebr “does not teach                          
                a lid vent.”                                                                                    
                             36. The Examiner further found that Kuel’s Figure 1                                
                describes, in the same field of endeavor, “a collection apparatus with a lid                    
                (5) and vent (18).”                                                                             

                             37. The Examiner held that:                                                        
                       It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to have provided                    
                       the Gehr device with a vent as taught by Kuel in order to provide it                     
                       with additional air circulation means.”                                                  
                       38. The Examiner further noted:                                                          
                       With respect to Claims 3 and 13, Gebr does not teach [an] L shaped                       
                       retainer member to hold a hood to an abutment surface for contacting                     
                       the lid about the vent hole or a catch opposite the retainer.  Kuel                      
                       teaches a hinge or retainer which is L-shaped, as broadly recited and                    
                       interpreted, which attaches hood (21) and lid (5).  Opposite the L-                      
                                                      11                                                        




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007