Ex Parte KRAUS - Page 76

          Appeal No. 2005-0841                                                        
          Application No. 08/230,083                                                  

                            RECAPTURE UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 251                           
               The reissue statute expressly permits a patentee to obtain             
          reissue claims broader than the originally issued claims at any             
          time within two years from the date the original patent issues.             
          35 U.S.C. § 251.  The scope of permissible broadened reissue claims         
          is limited by a judicial doctrine known as the "recapture rule."            
          The "recapture rule" was developed to prohibit a patentee from              
          obtaining by reissue broadened claims that "recapture" subject              
          matter the patentee "deliberately surrendered" during the course of         
          the original prosecution to obtain the patent.  When an applicant           
          cancels or amends a claim to overcome a prior art rejection, and            
          then relies on the changes made to the claim in arguing                     
          patentability of the amended claim, the law infers that the patent          
          applicant admits that the prior art forecloses the scope of the             
          original claim.  As a result of this inferred admission,                    
          competitors are free to practice the subject matter surrendered by          
          the patentee through the cancellation or amendment.  To preserve            
          the public notice function of the file history, the "recapture              
          rule" precludes the patentee from recanting the admission that the          
          prior art precluded a certain breadth of claim scope.                       
                                    BURDEN OF PROOF                                   
               We agree with the plurality that an examiner has the burden of         
          making out a prima facie case of recapture.  However, we believe            
          that the examiner makes out the prima facie case of recapture by            


                                        -76-                                          


Page:  Previous  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007