Ex Parte KRAUS - Page 88

          Appeal No. 2005-0841                                                        
          Application No. 08/230,083                                                  

          binding on this Board.23  See, for example, Willingham, Wesseler,           
          Richman, Wadlinger, Ball, Whittaker and Clement discussed in                
          Appendixes 7 and 8.                                                         
               In its first decision, South Corp. v. United States, 690 F.2d          
          1368, 1370 & n.2, 215 USPQ 657, 657-58 & n.2 (Fed. Cir. 1982), the          
          Federal Circuit dealt unequivocally with the matter of binding              
          precedent.  Sitting, en banc, the court held that it would adhere           
          to the body of law that existed in its predecessor courts, the              
          United States Court of Claims and the United States Court of                
          Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA), as of September 30, 1982.                
          Overruling such precedent, or resolving a conflict between the two          
          predecessors, would require en banc consideration.24  The Federal           
          Circuit has faithfully observed the rule of South.  Even where it           
          is possible that a prior decision of the CCPA would be decided              




               23   Under Standard Operating Procedure 2 (Revision 6) (August 10, 2005),
          the following are considered precedent binding upon the Board:              
                    1. An opinion of the Supreme Court.                               
                    2. An en banc decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal    
                    Circuit.                                                          
                    3. A decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, or 
               its predecessors, the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA) and the
               Court of Claims, which the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit    
               considers binding precedent.                                           
                    4. An opinion of the Board made precedential by the procedures    
               contained in this or earlier versions of Standard Operating Procedure  2.
                    Standard Operating Procedure 2 can be found at                    
          http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/bpai/sop2.pdf.                        
               24   See also UMC Elec. Co. v. United States, 816 F.2d 647, 652 n. 6, 2
          USPQ2d 1465, 1468 n. 6 (Fed. Cir. 1987); United States v. Rush, 804 F.2d 645, 647
          (Fed. Cir. 1986); Gindes v. United States, 740 F.2d 947, 949-50 (Fed. Cir. 1984);
          Mother's Restaurant, Inc. v. Mama's Pizza, Inc., 723 F.2d 1566, 1569, 221 USPQ
          394, 397 (Fed. Cir. 1983).                                                  
                                        -88-                                          


Page:  Previous  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007