Appeal No. 2005-1383 Application No. 09/364,847 lines 16-18).” Id. The examiner states that Peoples does “not teach a fusion of enzymes catalyzing successive enzymatic reactions [emphasis added].” To that end, the examiner relies on the teachings of Bülow that the (i) “preparation of a bifunctional enzyme can be accomplished by joining the genes of two enzymes by removing the translational stop signal at the 3’-end of the first gene and ligating the ATG-start codon of the second gene in-frame with the first gene”; (ii) “the enzyme selected to be at the N-terminal end [of a bifunctional enzyme] is arbitrary and that the native tertiary structure of the fused enzymes remains almost intact”; (iii) “if the entire primary sequences of the [] native enzymes are maintained in [a] fusion, the enzymes usually retain most of their native specific activities despite being fused together;” and (iv) “a linker peptide of two to ten amino acids separating the fused native enzymes [of a bifunctional enzyme] is optimal.” Id., p. 8. The examiner concludes that . . . it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Peoples [] and Bulow [] for a beta-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase or acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHB polymerase fusion protein having a linker of between two and ten amino acids expressed in E. coli or a plant. One would have been motivated to make a beta-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase or acetoacetyl- CoA reductase and PHB polymerase fusion protein having a linker of between two and ten amino acids for expression in E. coli or a plant because of the teachings of Peoples [] who teach PHB is a commercially useful biopolymer that can be expressed in bacteria or plants as described above and Bulow [] who teach the advantages of fusion proteins, particularly those catalyzing sequential enzymatic reactions and that a linker of two to ten amino acids separating the native enzymes is optimal as described above [Answer, pp. 8-9]. In response, the appellants argue that Peoples “teaches the construction of polymerase fusions for the purpose of ‘altering the enzyme’s specificity to create novel polymerases’ (see column 23, lines 14-24).” Brief, p. 16. The appellants further argue 12Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007