Ex Parte KOPPOLU et al - Page 11




               Appeal No. 2005-1431                                                                                                 
               Application 09/442,070                                                                                               

                               hypermedia document, that specifies the location of at least a portion of an                         
                               object external to the first distributed hypermedia document,                                        
                                      wherein said object has type information associated with it to                                
                               identify and locate an executable application external to the first                                  
                               distributed hypermedia document, and                                                                 
                                      wherein said embed text format is parsed by said browser to                                   
                               automatically invoke said executable application to execute on said client                           
                               workstation in order to display said object and enable interactive                                   
                               processing of said object within a display area created at said first location                       
                               within the portion of said first distributed hypermedia document being                               
                               displayed in said first browser-controlled window.                                                   

                       The "Preliminary Amendment"13 filed with the application inserted definitions of a                           
               number of terms following column 66, line 41 of the specification and proposed to add new                            
               drawing Figures 57 and 58, which are copies of Figures 9.2 and 9.3 from page 170 (in Chapter 9)                      
               of the Windows Interface document.                                                                                   
                       In an April 26, 2001, first Office action,14 the examiner (a) refused to approve the new                     
               drawings and objected to the amendment to the specification as introducing new matter and                            
               (b) rejected claims 40-49 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, on the ground that various                         
               claim terms, including the "network" terms, lack written description support.                                        



                                                                                                                                   
                       13   Paper No. 1.                                                                                            
                       14   Paper No. 18.                                                                                           



                                                                11                                                                  





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007