Appeal No. 2005-1511 Application No. 09/879,398 Claims 6, 4 and 11 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows: 6. A method of treating a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia comprising the steps of: obtaining a donor material comprising bone marrow or peripheral blood collected from a donor; depleting said donor material in vitro of αβ+ T cells, thereby rendering the donor material rich in γδ+ T cells; activating said γδ+ T cells in vitro by treating said cells with a media comprising leukemia cells extracted from the patient and irradiated ex vivo, alone or in combination with an anti-T cell receptor (TCR) pan-δ antibody; and administering an effective amount of said activated γδ+ T cells to said leukemia patient, wherein said activated γδ+ T cells are cytolytic to the patient’s leukemia cells but minimally cytotoxic to the patient’s other cells. 4. The method in accordance with claim 6, wherein said activated γδ+ T cells predominantly express the Vδ1 phenotype. 11. The method in accordance with claim 6, wherein said media consists essentially of irradiated leukemia blast cells extracted from said patient, an anti-TCR-pan-δ antibody, and interleukin-2. The references relied upon by the examiner are: Bell et al.(Bell) WO 98/33891 Aug. 6, 1998 Ensslin et al. (Ensslin), “Comparison of cytolytic and proliferative activities of human γδ and αβ T cells from peripheral blood against various human tumor cell lines,” J. of National Cancer Institute, Vol. 83, pp. 1564-1569 (1991). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007