Ex Parte Bedi et al - Page 1






                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                
                               today was not written for publication and is not binding                                
                               precedent of the Board.                                                                 
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                  _______________                                                      
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  _______________                                                      
                                                 Ex parte ARTI BEDI                                                    
                                            and ELIZABETH F. BURGESS                                                   
                                                   ______________                                                      
                                                Appeal No. 2005-1598                                                   
                                                Application 10/103,162                                                 
                                                  _______________                                                      
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                  _______________                                                      
              Before WARREN, OWENS and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     
                                                  Decision on Appeal                                                   
                     This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally                 
              rejecting claims 37, 39, 41 through 67 and 69, all of the claims in the application.                     
                     Claims 37, 43, 53, 64 and 67 illustrate appellants’ invention of a packaged food product          
              comprising a frozen dough or batter food product and a packaged topping composition, wherein             
              the latter, at the stated conditions, is sufficiently fluid to allow the food product to be dipped into  
              the topping and the topping adheres to the food product, and are representative of the claims on         
              appeal:1                                                                                                 
              37.  A packaged food product comprising, in combination:                                                 
                                                                                                                      
              1  We have copied these claims as they stand of record in the amendment of February 24, 2003,            
              including the term “glycerine.” We use the customary spelling “glycerin” in our opinion.                 
              “Glycerin” is synonymic with “glycerol.” See, e.g., The Condensed Chemical Dictionary 502                
              (10th ed., Gessner G. Hawley, ed., New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1981).                       

                                                      - 1 -                                                            



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007