Ex Parte Stapleton et al - Page 5


                 Appeal No.  2005-1797                                                         Page 5                  
                 Application No.  09/954,975                                                                           
                 ordinary skill in the art presumed to be familiar with them.”  In re Rosselet, 347                    
                 F.2d 847, 851, 146 USPQ 183, 186 (CCPA 1965).                                                         
                        On this record the examiner has established that gallium compositions                          
                 have anti-viral activities and are effective in inhibiting the reverse transcriptase                  
                 activity of retroviruses such as HIV.  By inhibiting reverse transcriptase activity,                  
                 HIV replication is inhibited.  Collery teaches the use of gallium compositions as                     
                 antiviral agents.  See e.g., Collery, column 1, lines 6-8.  Accordingly, we find no                   
                 error in the examiner’s prima facie case of obviousness as it applies to claim 11                     
                 on appeal.                                                                                            
                        For their part, appellants assert (Supplemental Brief, page 10, emphasis                       
                 removed), “the issued claims in … [Collery] are limited to use of these [gallium]                     
                 compounds to treating tumors.”  This statement is inconsistent with the evidence                      
                 of record.  Not only does Collery discuss the use of gallium compositions as                          
                 pharmaceutical agents having antiviral activities throughout their specification                      
                 (see e.g., column 1, lines 6-10 and 39-41; column 2, lines 17-19; column 3, line                      
                 18 – column 4, line 19 and column 16, lines 5-29), Collery’s claim 1 specifically                     
                 states “[m]ethod for treatment of viral infections… comprising administering a                        
                 gallium complex….”  Accordingly, appellants’ argument is not persuasive.                              
                        Appellants also assert (Supplemental Brief, bridging paragraph, page 10)                       
                 that Collery’s gallium compositions are “complex heterocyclic compound[s] that                        
                 contain[ ], as one aspect, gallium (III) ions.”  In this regard, appellants assert                    
                 (Supplemental Brief, page 10, emphasis removed), Collery’s compositions were                          
                 not “gallium per se, but compounds that contained gallium in the context of N-                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007