Appeal No. 2005-1882 Application No. 09/989,244 occurs at the receiving side is misplaced at best. The Examiner has failed to show how either Kitao or Fong alone or in combination teaches the claimed relationship of the code data and control signals on transmitting side of the system with the code data also being transmitted. The Examiner has failed to meet the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Conclusion In view of the foregoing discussion, we have not sustained the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-5, 7, and 8. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007