Appeal No. 2005-1949 Application No. 09/829,168 In reviewing the Meyer reference, we find that it substantially supports the examiner’s findings. We make the following specific factual findings. Meyer describes the preparation of a synthetic milk substitute for dogs. (Meyer, page 1, translation, title; page 2, lines 24-25). That synthetic dog milk substitute has more than 30% protein, preferably between 31-40% (Meyer, translation, page 3, lines 24-25). Meyer’s described range substantially overlaps the claimed about 35-45% protein range of claim 1. Meyer also describes a synthetic dog milk substitute with a fat content of more than 25% fat, preferably from 25.5 to 40%. (Meyer, translation, page 4, lines 19-20). This range substantially overlaps the range of about 25 to 35% claimed in claim 1. Meyer describes a synthetic dog milk substitute having less than 30% lactose, preferably from 1 to 25% lactose (Meyer, translation, page 3, lines 23-24). Lactose is a carbohydrate. This range substantially overlaps the claimed range of about 10 to 25% carbohydrate of claim 1, and encompasses the claimed range of about 4-8% lactose for dependent claim 9. Additionally, Meyer describes the use of whey proteins, said to include beta-lactoglobulin, alpha-lactalbumin, serum albumin, 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007