Appeal No. 2005-1953 Page 16
Application No. 09/765,533
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons and those set forth in the Answer, giving due weight
to Appellant’ arguments, we determine that the preponderance of evidence weighs in
favor of the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 4, 6-18, 21 and 22 under § 103 and the
rejection of claim 23 under § 112, first paragraph. The rejection of claims 3, 5, 19 and
23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
The rejection of claim 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1, 4, 6-18, 21 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is affirmed.
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007