Appeal No. 2005-2077
Application No. 10/046,564
reasonable. Since Appellants have failed to specifically challenge the Examiner’s factual
determinations, we presume that they are in agreement with the Examiner. Thus, for the
reasons presented above regarding independent claim 1 and the reasons expressed by the
Examiner we will uphold these rejections.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons and those set forth in the Answer, given due weight to
Appellants’ arguments, we determine that the preponderance of evidence weighs in favor
of the Examiner’s rejections. Accordingly, the Examiner’s rejections under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) are affirmed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007