Ex Parte Strom - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                      
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                               


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                                              

                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                            
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                                               
                                                      ____________                                                                           
                                             Ex parte CHRISTER STROM                                                                         
                                                    ____________                                                                             
                                                Appeal No. 2005-2101                                                                         
                                              Application No. 09/922,504                                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                                             
                                             HEARD: JANUARY 24, 2006                                                                         
                                                    ____________                                                                             
             Before FRANKFORT, CRAWFORD and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                              
             FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                         


                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                             


             This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 7, all                                     
             of the claims remaining in the application. Claims 8 through 14 have been canceled.                                             


             Appellant’s invention relates to a ventilator of the type having an inspiratory unit and an                                     
             expiratory valve for regulating a flow of breathing gas, and a control unit for controlling the                                 
             inspiratory unit and expiratory valve to, among other things, generate a “recruitment                                           
             phase” with an elevated basic pressure for the breathing gas, with a plurality of breaths                                       
             superimposed on the elevated basic pressure and an increased breathing rate with no                                             















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007