Ex Parte Hopson - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                        
                    written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        


                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                        Ex parte CHARLES B. HOPSON                                            
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                            Appeal No. 2005-2119                                              
                                          Application No. 10/103,063                                          
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
                Before KIMLIN, TIMM and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                       
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                



                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                Applicant appeals the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting                      
                claims 1 to 6 and 14 to 23.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §134.1                      



                                                                                                             
                       1  In rendering this decision, we have considered Appellant’s arguments                
                presented in the Brief, filed December 9, 2004 and the Reply Brief, filed April 20,           
                2005.                                                                                         










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007