Appeal No. 2005-2282 Page 12 Application No. 09/505,807 2. Anticipation Determination "A claim is anticipated only if each and every element as set forth in the claim is found, either expressly or inherently described, in a single prior art reference." Verdegaal Bros., Inc. v. Union Oil Co., 814 F.2d 628, 631, 2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (citing Structural Rubber Prods. Co. v. Park Rubber Co., 749 F.2d 707, 715, 223 USPQ 1264, 1270 (Fed. Cir. 1984); Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548, 220 USPQ 193, 198 (Fed. Cir. 1983); Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 713 F.2d 760, 771, 218 USPQ 781, 789 (Fed. Cir. 1983)). "[A]bsence from the reference of any claimed element negates anticipation." Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible, Inc., 793 F.2d 1565, 1571, 230 USPQ 81, 84 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Here, Figure 3 of Woodring "illustrat[es] one embodiment of the [reference's] software architecture 200. . . . The software architecture 200 comprises . . . a local multimedia Inter-Process Communication (IPC) channel 230, . . . a remote multimedia IPC channel 250, and a communication engine 260." Col. 4, ll. 56-62. "As will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art, the [aforementioned] IPC channel system architecture 300 is generic to any producer-consumer relationship, whether it is local or remote." Col. 6, ll. 10-12. Accordingly, the local multimedia IPC channel 230 and the remote multimedia IPC channel 250 will each include its own queue controlled by itsPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007