THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER PETER OLSON,
JOSEPH DANIEL COENEN, MARY JO MEYER,
ERIC DONALD JOHNSON,
SARAH JANE MARIE FREIBURGER,
JEROME STEVEN VEITH,
HEATHER SCHNECK MORTELL and
ROBERT EUGENE VOGT
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-2330
Application 1 10/026,123
____________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KIMLIN, PAK, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 23, which are all of the claims
pending in the above-identified application. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1 Application for patent filed December 17, 2001.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007