The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER PETER OLSON, JOSEPH DANIEL COENEN,
MARY JO MEYER, PAUL JOSEPH DATTA, ERIC DONALD JOHNSON,
SARAH JANE MARIE FREIBURGER, JEROME STEVEN, HEATHER SCHENCK
and ROBERT EUGENE VOGT
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-2330
Application No. 10/026,123
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST ON REHEARING
Appellants request a rehearing of the Board’s decision
entered March 1, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “our
decision”), wherein we affirm the examiner’s decision rejecting
claims 1 through 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
We have carefully considered the arguments raised by the
appellants in the Request for Rehearing dated April 28, 2006
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007