Ex Parte Schmidt - Page 19



                Appeal 2005-2349                                                                             
                Application 09/961,126                                                                       

                resin.  The present record is deficient as to the properties of this "suitable               
                isocyanate resin."  In order for the alternate means disclosed by Wallick to                 
                anticipate the water supply device of the present invention there must be                    
                some evidence which establishes that the consistency and flow                                
                characteristics of the "suitable isocyanate resin" are the same as or                        
                comparable to that of water.  The Examiner has not made such a finding on                    
                the present record, and the majority has not addressed this deficiency.  Based               
                upon these disclosures appearing in column 5, it appears that the resin                      
                supply device depicted in Figure 2b is designed to provide a coating of high                 
                concentration resin to the tips of the traveling medium. 4  There is no                      
                indication that such a device suitable for applying a higher concentration of                
                resin is also suitable for applying water to the fluted tips.  While it may be               
                possible for a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the resin supply                
                device depicted in Figure 2b to apply water to the fluted tips, such is not the              
                standard under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).5                                                          



                                                                                                            
                4 The present record does not include findings as to the structural materials                
                used to form the roll coater.  Thus, the present record does not have                        
                sufficient information to establish structural similarity.  The identification of            
                a component base solely on the appearance in the figures is insufficient to                  
                describe the materials from which the component is constructed.                              
                5 In my opinion, prior to disposition of the present application, the Examiner               
                should determine whether the appealed subject matter is patentable over the                  
                Wallick references under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                    
                                                    -19-                                                     




Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007