Ex Parte Hamilton et al - Page 3




             Appeal No. 2005-2458                                                               3              
             Application No. 10/003,900                                                                        


                          1.  A storage wrap material comprising                                               
                          a sheet material having a thickness ranging from about 0.0001                        
                   inches (0.0025 mm) to 0.001 inches (0.025 mm), said sheet material                          
                   having a first active side and a second side, the first active side                         
                   comprising a plurality of three-dimensional non-adherent protrusions                        
                   extending outwardly from surrounding depressions and                                        
                          an adhesive composition coating on at least a portion of the                         
                   depressions, wherein the adhesive composition coating has a thickness                       
                   less than the height of the non-adherent protrusions and from about                         
                   0.00001 (0.00025 mm) to about 0.0002 inches (0.0051 mm) in thickness.                       
             (formatting and emphasis added).                                                                  
                   It is the adhesive coating thickness limitation emphasized above that is the focus          
             of this appeal.  There is no dispute that McGuire describes or suggests a storage wrap            
             material having the sheet structure required by the claims and an adhesive composition            
             coating contained within the depressions of the sheet.  That the general conditions of            
             the claimed storage wrap material is taught by McGuire is further evident from a                  
             comparison of Appellants’ Figure 3 with McGuire’s Figure 9.                                       
                   It is the Examiner’s position that even though McGuire does not expressly                   
             disclose the thickness range of the claimed adhesive composition coating, the guidance            
             provided by the reference with regard to the general conditions of the storage wrap               
             material indicates that the thicknesses were within the capabilities of those of ordinary         
             skill in this art; the workable and/or optimal thickness range for the adhesive coating           
             being the type of parameter readily determined through routine experimentation.  The              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007