Appeal No. 2005-2606 Παγε 6 Application No. 10/077,718 Stoll does not describe a clamping arm. Rather, Stoll describes a foot rest having an arm 13 that can be rotated to adjust the height of the foot rest. In addition, there is no suggestion in Stoll that the arm 13 and the stand or base be used as a clamping mechanism. As Stoll does not describe nor suggest a clamping mechanism, we will not sustain the examiner's rejections of claim 22 and claim 23 dependent thereon. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED JOHN P. MCQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) STUART S. LEVY ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007