Ex Parte LEVY - Page 4


                  Appeal No. 2005-2667                                                                                                                    
                  Application 08/943,125                                                                                                                  

                  functionalities and water” (‘223 reference, page 2, ll. 10-17, and page 6, ll. 9-11; ‘304 reference,                                    
                  col. 1, ll. 45-53, and col. 3, ll. 37-40).  We find that Arroyo describes superabsorbent materials                                      
                  generally, including those based on polyacrylic acid and polyacrylonitrile, and discloses that                                          
                  “[t]he preferred superabsorbent material is AridallTM 1125F Superabsorbent Polymer available                                            
                  from the Chemdal Corporation,” and that “Aridall polymers are crosslinked acrylic polymers”                                             
                  (col. 5, l. 35, to col. 7, l. 1).                                                                                                       
                           Appellant discloses in the written description in the specification that “[t]he                                                
                  superabsorbent polymer employed according to the invention, absorbs from about 25 to greater                                            
                  than 100 times its weight in water and comprises a polymer of acrylic acid, an acrylic ester,                                           
                  acrylonitrile or acrylamide, including co-polymers thereof or starch graft copolymers thereof or                                        
                  mixtures thereof, where the mixtures contain from 2 to about 3 or 4 superabsorbent polymers”                                            
                  (page 21, ll. 1-7).  Appellant further discloses that the superabsorbent polymers include those                                         
                  listed in certain United States Patents as well as certain commercially available polymers (pages                                       
                  21-23).  Included among the latter is “AridallTM which are sodium or potassium polyacrylates                                            
                  that may be lightly cross-linked” (page 22, ll. 17-18).                                                                                 
                           Appellant argues in the brief that the “swelling value” disclosed in Geursen references                                        
                  includes “the relative water absorbency of the yarn or the yarn coated with the superabsorbent                                          
                  polymer composition,” and provides a supporting explanation based on the disclosure in                                                  
                  Example I, including Table A, of the references for the contention that the same would not have                                         
                  disclosed “superabsorbent polymers that can absorb greater than about 100 times their weight in                                         
                  water” (brief, pages 6-10 and 12; see reply brief, page 6).  The composition includes “Mirox                                            
                  W 45985” which is a superabsorbent polymer that “is a terpolymer of acrylamide, carboxyl                                                
                  groups- and sulpho groups-containing polymers” (‘223 reference, pages 15-17; ‘304 reference,                                            
                  cols. 8-9).                                                                                                                             
                           In response to appellant’s arguments in the brief, the examiner points to the disclosure in                                    
                  the Geursen references that “[d]epending on the nature of the substrate and the quantity and                                            
                  nature of the superabsorbent material applied thereto, the swelling values ranges from 50 to 700                                        
                  or higher, more particularly from 100 to 700 or higher” (‘223 reference, page 2, ll. 10-17, and                                         
                  page 6, ll. 9-11; ‘304 reference, col. 7, ll. 2-6) (answer, page 6).                                                                    


                                                                          - 4 -                                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007